Accessibility settings

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Theme Issue 2025: Advancing Telerehabilitation Research and Innovation (26) Telehealth and Telemonitoring (2224) Emerging Technologies for Rehabilitation (389) Internet for Rehabilitation (97) Reviews on Innovation in Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies (72) mHealth for Rehabilitation (393) Innovations in Exercise Rehabilitation (313) Telerehabilitation (238)

Published on in Vol 12 (2025)

This is a member publication of University of Toronto

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/68681, first published .
The Safety of Telerehabilitation: Systematic Review

The Safety of Telerehabilitation: Systematic Review

The Safety of Telerehabilitation: Systematic Review

Authors of this article:

Hila Shnitzer1 Author Orcid Image ;   Josh Chan2 Author Orcid Image ;   Thomas Yau3 Author Orcid Image ;   McKyla McIntyre3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Angie Andreoli3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Ailene Kua4, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Mark Bayley3, 4, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Carl Froilan Leochico3, 6, 7 Author Orcid Image ;   Meiqi Guo4 Author Orcid Image ;   Sarah Munce8, 9 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (9) Tweetations (1) Metrics

Journals

  1. Herrera-Rojas A, Moreno-Molina A, García-García E, Molina-Rodríguez N, Cano-de-la-Cuerda R. Effects of Telerehabilitation Platforms on Quality of Life in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials. NeuroSci 2025;6(4):103 View
  2. Jiang S, Guo M, Munce S, Leochico C, Bayley M, Kua A, McIntyre M, Andreoli A. Provider perspectives on safety of telerehabilitation and risks of nonphysical harm for neurological conditions: a qualitative descriptive study. Disability and Rehabilitation 2026;48(7):2006 View
  3. Kotlega D, Kobus-Kotlega K, Szczuko M. Narrative Review on Post-Stroke Outcomes Through Recognition of Frailty, Sarcopenia, and Palliative Care Needs. Healthcare 2025;13(23):3011 View
  4. Jellad A, Chaabeni A, Ben Saad H. Rehabilitation needs and challenges in Gaza strip (Palestine) after the ceasefire: A call for coordinated action. Journal of Public Health Research 2025;14(4) View
  5. Houben-Wilke S, Vaes A, Cuijpers M, Diederen G, Evertse S, Jansen J, Loven K, van Melick P, Meys R, Posthuma R, Sillen M, Ubachs-van Zandvoort S, Franssen F, van ’t Hul A, Spruit M. An overview of the importance of allied healthcare for patients with COPD. Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine 2026:1 View
  6. Micheluzzi V, Merella P, Burrai F, Canu A, Sircana A, Marongiu B, Soro G, Casu G. Optimizing cardiac telerehabilitation programs: psychological, social, and implementation factors. Current Problems in Cardiology 2026;51(5):103290 View
  7. Ordoñez-Mora L, Urrea-Arango D, Avila-Valencia J, Estela-Zape J, Morales-Osorio M, Serna-Orozco M. Telerehabilitation for Pain, Function, and Quality of Life in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review. Oncology and Therapy 2026 View
  8. Maia O, Moreira Gonçalves D, Vilarinho R. Effects of Telerehabilitation on Gross Motor Function in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review. Healthcare 2026;14(7):942 View
  9. Via J, Hurst C, Dent E, Fyfe J, Jansons P, Hayes E, Sim M, Aubertin-Leheudre M, de Lima A, Bohn L, Britting S, Buckinx F, Connolly G, Giangregorio L, Henriques-Neto D, Jones J, Kob R, Morin S, N G, Orssatto L, Pearson M, Pinto D, Reijnierse E, Said C, Salem M, Skinner G, Tan V, Tran R, Zanker J, Daly R, Scott D. Remote assessment and management of physical function in older adults (RAMP): An international expert Delphi process. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2026;147:106266 View