This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Reviews on Innovation in Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies (40) Cognitive and Neurorehabilitation (236)

Published on in Vol 5, No 1 (2018): Jan-Jun

Evolution of Cognitive Rehabilitation After Stroke From Traditional Techniques to Smart and Personalized Home-Based Information and Communication Technology Systems: Literature Review

Evolution of Cognitive Rehabilitation After Stroke From Traditional Techniques to Smart and Personalized Home-Based Information and Communication Technology Systems: Literature Review

Evolution of Cognitive Rehabilitation After Stroke From Traditional Techniques to Smart and Personalized Home-Based Information and Communication Technology Systems: Literature Review

Authors of this article:

José M Cogollor1 Author Orcid Image ;   Javier Rojo-Lacal2 Author Orcid Image ;   Joachim Hermsdörfer3 Author Orcid Image ;   Manuel Ferre1 Author Orcid Image ;   Maria Teresa Arredondo Waldmeyer2 Author Orcid Image ;   Christos Giachritsis4 Author Orcid Image ;   Alan Armstrong3 Author Orcid Image ;   Jose Manuel Breñosa Martinez1 Author Orcid Image ;   Doris Anabelle Bautista Loza1 Author Orcid Image ;   José María Sebastián1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (22) Tweetations (4) Metrics

Journals

  1. Marwaa M, Kristensen H, Guidetti S, Ytterberg C, Cikajlo I. Physiotherapists’ and occupational therapists’ perspectives on information and communication technology in stroke rehabilitation. PLOS ONE 2020;15(8):e0236831 View
  2. Wilms I. The computerized cognitive training alliance – A proposal for a therapeutic alliance model for home-based computerized cognitive training. Heliyon 2020;6(1):e03254 View
  3. Draaisma L, Wessel M, Hummel F. Neurotechnologies as tools for cognitive rehabilitation in stroke patients. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 2020;20(12):1249 View
  4. Khalili-Mahani N, De Schutter B. Affective Game Planning for Health Applications: Quantitative Extension of Gerontoludic Design Based on the Appraisal Theory of Stress and Coping. JMIR Serious Games 2019;7(2):e13303 View
  5. Camara Gradim L, Archanjo Jose M, Marinho Cezar da Cruz D, de Deus Lopes R. IoT Services and Applications in Rehabilitation: An Interdisciplinary and Meta-Analysis Review. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 2020;28(9):2043 View
  6. Zinchenko O, Kas I, Petukhova I, Ustymenko T. STAGES OF REHABILITATION OF PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT. International Medical Journal 2021;(1):56 View
  7. van der Ham I, van der Vaart R, Miedema A, Visser-Meily J, van der Kuil M. Healthcare Professionals’ Acceptance of Digital Cognitive Rehabilitation. Frontiers in Psychology 2020;11 View
  8. Rohrbach N, Krewer C, Löhnert L, Thierfelder A, Randerath J, Jahn K, Hermsdörfer J. Improvement of Apraxia With Augmented Reality: Influencing Pantomime of Tool Use via Holographic Cues. Frontiers in Neurology 2021;12 View
  9. Thalman C, Hertzell T, Debeurre M, Lee H. Multi-degrees-of-freedom soft robotic ankle-foot orthosis for gait assistance and variable ankle support. Wearable Technologies 2022;3 View
  10. Selamat S, Che Me R, Ahmad Ainuddin H, Salim M, Ramli H, Romli M. The Application of Technological Intervention for Stroke Rehabilitation in Southeast Asia: A Scoping Review With Stakeholders' Consultation. Frontiers in Public Health 2022;9 View
  11. Nikolaev V, Safonicheva O, Nikolaev A. A Review of International Experience for Telerehabilitation of Post-stroke Patients with Aphasia and Cognitive Problems. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine 2022;21(1):64 View
  12. Scarcella I, Marino F, Failla C, Doria G, Chilà P, Minutoli R, Vetrano N, Vagni D, Pignolo L, Di Cara M, Settimo C, Quartarone A, Cerasa A, Pioggia G. Information and communication technologies-based interventions for children with autism spectrum conditions: a systematic review of randomized control trials from a positive technology perspective. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2023;14 View
  13. Park M, Ha Y. Effects of Virtual Reality-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Healthcare 2023;11(21):2846 View
  14. Arntz A, Weber F, Handgraaf M, Lällä K, Korniloff K, Murtonen K, Chichaeva J, Kidritsch A, Heller M, Sakellari E, Athanasopoulou C, Lagiou A, Tzonichaki I, Salinas-Bueno I, Martínez-Bueso P, Velasco-Roldán O, Schulz R, Grüneberg C. Technologies in Home-Based Digital Rehabilitation: Scoping Review. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies 2023;10:e43615 View
  15. Vuori O, Kallio E, Wikström A, Jokinen H, Hietanen M. Web-based psychoeducational interventions for managing cognitive impairment–a systematic review. Frontiers in Neurology 2023;14 View
  16. Maggio M, Baglio F, Arcuri F, Borgnis F, Contrada M, Diaz M, Leochico C, Neira N, Laratta S, Suchan B, Tonin P, Calabrò R. Cognitive telerehabilitation: an expert consensus paper on current evidence and future perspective. Frontiers in Neurology 2024;15 View
  17. Noronha M, Zárate L. Identifying longevity profiles from longitudinal data through factor analysis and biclustering. Intelligent Data Analysis 2024:1 View
  18. Seregni A, Tropea P, Re R, Biscaro V, Judica E, Caprino M, Gand K, Schlieter H, Corbo M. Secondary care for subjects with stroke: Compliance, usability and technological acceptance of the vCare platform solution. Smart Health 2024;32:100483 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Champod A, Eskes G, Barrett A. Neurovascular Neuropsychology. View
  2. Ahmad A, Ahlin K, Mozelius P. Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health. View
  3. Thöne-Otto A. Assistive Technologien im Sozial- und Gesundheitssektor. View
  4. . Principles of Cognitive Rehabilitation. View