This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Assistive Technologies (118) Robotics in Rehabilitation (38) Technology in Physiotherapy (136) Use and Perceptions of Technology in Everyday Life and for Rehabilitation (27)

Published on in Vol 2, No 1 (2015): Jan-Jun

Perceptions of Technology and Its Use for Therapeutic Application for Individuals With Hemiparesis: Findings From Adult and Pediatric Focus Groups

Perceptions of Technology and Its Use for Therapeutic Application for Individuals With Hemiparesis: Findings From Adult and Pediatric Focus Groups

Perceptions of Technology and Its Use for Therapeutic Application for Individuals With Hemiparesis: Findings From Adult and Pediatric Focus Groups

Authors of this article:

Melanie Y Lam1 Author Orcid Image ;   Sandy K Tatla2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Keith R Lohse4 Author Orcid Image ;   Navid Shirzad5 Author Orcid Image ;   Alison M Hoens6 Author Orcid Image ;   Kimberly J Miller6 Author Orcid Image ;   Liisa Holsti2, 7 Author Orcid Image ;   Naznin Virji-Babul6, 7 Author Orcid Image ;   HF Machiel Van der Loos8 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (22) Tweetations (5) Metrics

Journals

  1. Yusif S, Soar J, Hafeez-Baig A. Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2016;94:112 View
  2. Signal N, McLaren R, Rashid U, Vandal A, King M, Almesfer F, Henderson J, Taylor D. Haptic Nudges Increase Affected Upper Limb Movement During Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: Multiple-Period Randomized Crossover Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(7):e17036 View
  3. Choi H, Wren T, Steele K. Gastrocnemius operating length with ankle foot orthoses in cerebral palsy. Prosthetics & Orthotics International 2017;41(3):274 View
  4. Mortazavi F, Nadian-Ghomsheh A. Continues online exercise monitoring and assessment system with visual guidance feedback for stroke rehabilitation. Multimedia Tools and Applications 2019;78(22):32055 View
  5. Emmerson K, Harding K, Lockwood K, Taylor N. Home exercise programs supported by video and automated reminders for patients with stroke: A qualitative analysis. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 2018;65(3):187 View
  6. Valdés B, Glegg S, Lambert-Shirzad N, Schneider A, Marr J, Bernard R, Lohse K, Hoens A, Van der Loos H. Application of Commercial Games for Home-Based Rehabilitation for People with Hemiparesis: Challenges and Lessons Learned. Games for Health Journal 2018;7(3):197 View
  7. Lambert-Shirzad N, Van der Loos H. On identifying kinematic and muscle synergies: a comparison of matrix factorization methods using experimental data from the healthy population. Journal of Neurophysiology 2017;117(1):290 View
  8. Smith A, Sookhoo J, McArthur C, Surlin S, Akinyemi A, Gardner P, Papaioannou A. “Think of It Like a Game”: Older Adults’ and Health Professionals’ Perspectives on Interactive Exercise Technology Design. Physiotherapy Canada 2021;73(3):286 View
  9. Fahr A, Kläy A, Keller J, van Hedel H. An Interactive Computer Game for Improving Selective Voluntary Motor Control in Children With Upper Motor Neuron Lesions: Development and Preliminary Feasibility Study. JMIR Serious Games 2021;9(3):e26028 View
  10. Narbutaitienė J, Björklund Carlstedt A, Fischl C. Stroke survivors’ experiences and meaning of digital technology in daily life: a phenomenological study. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2024;19(4):1334 View
  11. Postol N, Barton J, Wakely L, Bivard A, Spratt N, Marquez J. “Are we there yet?” expectations and experiences with lower limb robotic exoskeletons: a qualitative evaluation of the therapist perspective. Disability and Rehabilitation 2024;46(5):1023 View
  12. Postol N, Grissell J, McHugh C, Bivard A, Spratt N, Marquez J. Effects of therapy with a free-standing robotic exoskeleton on motor function and other health indicators in people with severe mobility impairment due to chronic stroke: A quasi-controlled study. Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering 2021;8 View
  13. Henni S, Maurud S, Fuglerud K, Moen A. The experiences, needs and barriers of people with impairments related to usability and accessibility of digital health solutions, levels of involvement in the design process and strategies for participatory and universal design: a scoping review. BMC Public Health 2022;22(1) View
  14. Elmanowski J, Kleynen M, Geers R, Rovelo-Ruiz G, Geurts E, Coninx K, Verbunt J, Seelen H. Task-oriented arm training for stroke patients based on remote handling technology concepts: A feasibility study. Technology and Health Care 2023;31(5):1593 View
  15. Srinivasan S, Kumavor P, Morgan K. A Pilot Feasibility Study on the Use of Dual-Joystick-Operated Ride-on Toys in Upper Extremity Rehabilitation for Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy. Children 2024;11(4):408 View
  16. Al Saadoon M, Eltayib R, Alhaj A, Chan M, Aldhafri S, Al-Adawi S. The Perception and Roles of School Mental Health Professionals Regarding School Bullying (Suluk Audwani) in Oman: A Qualitative Study in an Urban Setting. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2024;21(8):991 View
  17. Court R, Swallow V, El-Yousfi S, Gray-Burrows K, Sotir F, Wheeler G, Kellar I, Lee J, Mitchell R, Mlynarczyk W, Ramavath A, Dimitri P, Phillips B, Prodgers L, Pownall M, Kowalczyk M, Branchflower J, Powell L, Bhanbhro S, Weighall A, Martin-Kerry J. Children and young people’s preferences and needs when using health technology to self-manage a long-term condition: a scoping review. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2024;109(10):826 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. van Ommeren A, Prange-Lasonder G, Rietman J, Veltink P, Buurke J. Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation II. View
  2. Carswell C, Rea P. Biomedical Visualisation. View
  3. Sales Gonçalves R, de Souza M, Carbone G, Ceccarelli M. Advances in Italian Mechanism Science. View