This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Theme Issue: The Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Rehabilitation (15) Telehealth and Telemonitoring (2088) JMIR Theme Issue: COVID-19 Special Issue (2554) Technology in Physiotherapy (190)

Published on in Vol 9, No 2 (2022): Apr-Jun

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/35569, first published .
The Current State of Remote Physiotherapy in Finland: Cross-sectional Web-Based Questionnaire Study

The Current State of Remote Physiotherapy in Finland: Cross-sectional Web-Based Questionnaire Study

The Current State of Remote Physiotherapy in Finland: Cross-sectional Web-Based Questionnaire Study

Authors of this article:

Thomas Hellstén1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Jari Arokoski1, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Tuulikki Sjögren4 Author Orcid Image ;   Anna-Maija Jäppinen5 Author Orcid Image ;   Jyrki Kettunen6 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (12) Tweetations (6) Metrics

Journals

  1. Jonsdottir J, Santoyo-Medina C, Kahraman T, Kalron A, Rasova K, Moumdjian L, Coote S, Tacchino A, Grange E, Smedal T, Arntzen E, Learmonth Y, Pedulla L, Quinn G, Kos D. Changes in physiotherapy services and use of technology for people with multiple sclerosis during the COVID-19 pandemic. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders 2023;71:104520 View
  2. Hellstén T, Arokoski J, Sjögren T, Jäppinen A, Kettunen J. Remote physiotherapy in Finland—suitability, usability and factors affecting its use. European Journal of Physiotherapy 2023;25(6):378 View
  3. Säteri S, Heinonen A, Sjögren T. How was remote technology accepted among cardiac rehabilitees in outpatient self-rehabilitation context?. European Journal of Physiotherapy 2024;26(4):211 View
  4. Sinkkonen E, Korpi H, Sjögren T. The added value of remote technology and the background factors explaining the changes in biopsychosocial functioning in cardiac rehabilitation: cluster randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Physiotherapy 2024;26(4):188 View
  5. Dicianno B, Salh A, Morris L, Xiang Y, Ding D. Rehabilitation clinicians’ use of mainstream wireless technologies in practice: a scoping review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2024;19(8):2742 View
  6. Martinsen L, Østerås N, Moseng T, Tveter A. Usage, Attitudes, Facilitators, and Barriers Toward Digital Health Technologies in Musculoskeletal Care: Survey Among Primary Care Physiotherapists in Norway. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies 2024;11:e54116 View
  7. Olsen S, Lim X, Alder G, Stavric V, Signal N. Factors influencing adoption and sustained use of rehabilitation technologies: a scoping review and qualitative analysis. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2025;20(4):804 View
  8. Hellstén T, Arokoski J, Karlsson J, Ristolainen L, Kettunen J. Reliability and validity of computer vision‐based markerless human pose estimation for measuring hip and knee range of motion. Healthcare Technology Letters 2025;12(1) View
  9. Thurston C, Johansson S, von Koch L, English C, Conradsson D. Cross-sector collaboration to develop a mobile health solution for promotion of physical activity after stroke or transient ischaemic attack in Sweden. BMC Digital Health 2025;3(1) View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Sjögren T, Korpi H. Digital Health and Wireless Solutions. View

Conference Proceedings

  1. Keyanfar A, Roeintan M, Tayebi A. 2022 International Conference on Intelligent Technology, System and Service for Internet of Everything (ITSS-IoE). Designing a device to guide the steps of doing physiotherapy exercises based on the Internet of Things View
  2. Falkowski P, Gwardecki F. 2024 13th International Workshop on Robot Motion and Control (RoMoCo). ExoReha Exoskeleton Digital Twin in Metaverse for Telerehabilitation View