This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Robotics in Rehabilitation (59) Cognitive and Neurorehabilitation (349) Robots in Healthcare (122)

Published on in Vol 5, No 1 (2018): Jan-Jun

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/9535, first published .
Perceptions of Existing Wearable Robotic Devices for Upper Extremity and Suggestions for Their Development: Findings From Therapists and People With Stroke

Perceptions of Existing Wearable Robotic Devices for Upper Extremity and Suggestions for Their Development: Findings From Therapists and People With Stroke

Perceptions of Existing Wearable Robotic Devices for Upper Extremity and Suggestions for Their Development: Findings From Therapists and People With Stroke

Authors of this article:

Ahmed Elnady1 Author Orcid Image ;   W Ben Mortenson2, 3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Carlo Menon5 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (23) Tweetations (3) Metrics

Journals

  1. Nanda S, Mahapatra S, Lindeen S, Bernau J, Cutshall S, Schierwater B, Chon T, Wahner-Roedler D, Bauer B. Evaluation of a Novel Wellness Assessment Device (Preventiometer): A Feasibility Pilot Study. Global Advances in Health and Medicine 2019;8 View
  2. Howard J, Fisher Z, Kemp A, Lindsay S, Tasker L, Tree J. Exploring the barriers to using assistive technology for individuals with chronic conditions: a meta-synthesis review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2022;17(4):390 View
  3. Louie D, Bird M, Menon C, Eng J. Perspectives on the prospective development of stroke-specific lower extremity wearable monitoring technology: a qualitative focus group study with physical therapists and individuals with stroke. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2020;17(1) View
  4. Proulx C, Higgins J, Gagnon D. Occupational therapists’ evaluation of the perceived usability and utility of wearable soft robotic exoskeleton gloves for hand function rehabilitation following a stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2023;18(6):953 View
  5. Simpson L, Menon C, Hodgson A, Ben Mortenson W, Eng J. Clinicians’ perceptions of a potential wearable device for capturing upper limb activity post-stroke: a qualitative focus group study. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2021;18(1) View
  6. Jovanovic L, Jervis Rademeyer H, Pakosh M, Musselman K, Popovic M, Marquez-Chin C. Scoping Review on Brain-Computer Interface–Controlled Electrical Stimulation Interventions for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Adults: A Look at Participants, Interventions, and Technology. Physiotherapy Canada 2023;75(3):276 View
  7. Toh S, Gonzalez P, Fong K. Usability of a wearable device for home-based upper limb telerehabilitation in persons with stroke: A mixed-methods study. DIGITAL HEALTH 2023;9 View
  8. Seim C, Ritter B, Starner T, Flavin K, Lansberg M, Okamura A. Design of a Wearable Vibrotactile Stimulation Device for Individuals With Upper-Limb Hemiparesis and Spasticity. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 2022;30:1277 View
  9. Laparidou D, Curtis F, Akanuwe J, Goher K, Niroshan Siriwardena A, Kucukyilmaz A. Patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2021;18(1) View
  10. Fazeli H, Peng Q. Generation and evaluation of product concepts by integrating extended axiomatic design, quality function deployment and design structure matrix. Advanced Engineering Informatics 2022;54:101716 View
  11. Langerak A, Regterschot G, Selles R, Meskers C, Evers M, Ribbers G, van Beijnum B, Bussmann J. Requirements for home-based upper extremity rehabilitation using wearable motion sensors for stroke patients: a user-centred approach. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2024;19(4):1392 View
  12. Forbrigger S, Liblong M, Davies T, DePaul V, Morin E, Hashtrudi-Zaad K. Considerations for at-home upper-limb rehabilitation technology following stroke: Perspectives of stroke survivors and therapists. Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering 2023;10 View
  13. Yang C, Chui R, Mortenson W, Servati P, Servati A, Tashakori A, Eng J. Perspectives of users for a future interactive wearable system for upper extremity rehabilitation following stroke: a qualitative study. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2023;20(1) View
  14. Prochaska E, Ammenwerth E. Clinical Utility and Usability of the Digital Box and Block Test: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies 2024;11:e54939 View
  15. Winterbottom L, Chen A, Mendonca R, Nilsen D, Ciocarlie M, Stein J. Clinician perceptions of a novel wearable robotic hand orthosis for post-stroke hemiparesis. Disability and Rehabilitation 2025;47(6):1577 View
  16. Pereira A, Machado Neto O, Elui V, Pimentel M. Wearable Smartphone-Based Multisensory Feedback System for Torso Posture Correction: Iterative Design and Within-Subjects Study. JMIR Aging 2025;8:e55455 View
  17. Bjørnskov S, Mortenson W, Helle T. User perceptions of aspects related to the use of the activity chair: A descriptive cross-sectional study. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 2025;88(3):149 View
  18. Fasano A, Mauro M, Beani E, Nicora G, Germanotta M, Falchini F, Pavan A, Habib V, Quaglini S, Sgandurra G, Aprile I. Towards the Identification of Patients’ Needs for Promoting Robotics and Allied Digital Technologies in Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review. Healthcare 2025;13(7):828 View
  19. Kheirollahzadeh M, Sarvghadi P, Azizkhani S, Bani Hani J, Monnin C, Choukou M. Digital Health Technology for Stroke Rehabilitation in Canada: A Scoping Review. Applied Sciences 2025;15(10):5340 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Thöne-Otto A. Assistive Technologien im Sozial- und Gesundheitssektor. View
  2. Demers M, Rowe J, Prochazka A. Neurorehabilitation Technology. View

Conference Proceedings

  1. Karam A, Alnajjar F, Gochoo M. 2020 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET). Assistive and Rehabilitation Robotics for Upper Limb Impairments in Post-Stroke Patients: Evaluation Criteria for the Design and Functionality View
  2. Frennert S, Persson J, Skavron S. Adjunct Proceedings of the 2024 Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. A Critical Narrative Review of Assistive Robotics and Call for a Systems and User-Centered Approaches to Enhance Quality of Life of Individuals with Disabilities View