This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Robotics in Rehabilitation (38) Cognitive and Neurorehabilitation (262) Robots in Healthcare (86)

Published on in Vol 5, No 1 (2018): Jan-Jun

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/9535, first published .
Perceptions of Existing Wearable Robotic Devices for Upper Extremity and Suggestions for Their Development: Findings From Therapists and People With Stroke

Perceptions of Existing Wearable Robotic Devices for Upper Extremity and Suggestions for Their Development: Findings From Therapists and People With Stroke

Perceptions of Existing Wearable Robotic Devices for Upper Extremity and Suggestions for Their Development: Findings From Therapists and People With Stroke

Authors of this article:

Ahmed Elnady1 Author Orcid Image ;   W Ben Mortenson2, 3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Carlo Menon5 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (21) Tweetations (4) Metrics

Journals

  1. Nanda S, Mahapatra S, Lindeen S, Bernau J, Cutshall S, Schierwater B, Chon T, Wahner-Roedler D, Bauer B. Evaluation of a Novel Wellness Assessment Device (Preventiometer): A Feasibility Pilot Study. Global Advances in Health and Medicine 2019;8 View
  2. Howard J, Fisher Z, Kemp A, Lindsay S, Tasker L, Tree J. Exploring the barriers to using assistive technology for individuals with chronic conditions: a meta-synthesis review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2022;17(4):390 View
  3. Louie D, Bird M, Menon C, Eng J. Perspectives on the prospective development of stroke-specific lower extremity wearable monitoring technology: a qualitative focus group study with physical therapists and individuals with stroke. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2020;17(1) View
  4. Proulx C, Higgins J, Gagnon D. Occupational therapists’ evaluation of the perceived usability and utility of wearable soft robotic exoskeleton gloves for hand function rehabilitation following a stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2023;18(6):953 View
  5. Simpson L, Menon C, Hodgson A, Ben Mortenson W, Eng J. Clinicians’ perceptions of a potential wearable device for capturing upper limb activity post-stroke: a qualitative focus group study. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2021;18(1) View
  6. Jovanovic L, Jervis Rademeyer H, Pakosh M, Musselman K, Popovic M, Marquez-Chin C. Scoping Review on Brain-Computer Interface–Controlled Electrical Stimulation Interventions for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Adults: A Look at Participants, Interventions, and Technology. Physiotherapy Canada 2023;75(3):276 View
  7. Toh S, Gonzalez P, Fong K. Usability of a wearable device for home-based upper limb telerehabilitation in persons with stroke: A mixed-methods study. DIGITAL HEALTH 2023;9 View
  8. Seim C, Ritter B, Starner T, Flavin K, Lansberg M, Okamura A. Design of a Wearable Vibrotactile Stimulation Device for Individuals With Upper-Limb Hemiparesis and Spasticity. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 2022;30:1277 View
  9. Laparidou D, Curtis F, Akanuwe J, Goher K, Niroshan Siriwardena A, Kucukyilmaz A. Patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2021;18(1) View
  10. Fazeli H, Peng Q. Generation and evaluation of product concepts by integrating extended axiomatic design, quality function deployment and design structure matrix. Advanced Engineering Informatics 2022;54:101716 View
  11. Langerak A, Regterschot G, Selles R, Meskers C, Evers M, Ribbers G, van Beijnum B, Bussmann J. Requirements for home-based upper extremity rehabilitation using wearable motion sensors for stroke patients: a user-centred approach. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2024;19(4):1392 View
  12. Forbrigger S, Liblong M, Davies T, DePaul V, Morin E, Hashtrudi-Zaad K. Considerations for at-home upper-limb rehabilitation technology following stroke: Perspectives of stroke survivors and therapists. Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering 2023;10 View
  13. Yang C, Chui R, Mortenson W, Servati P, Servati A, Tashakori A, Eng J. Perspectives of users for a future interactive wearable system for upper extremity rehabilitation following stroke: a qualitative study. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2023;20(1) View
  14. Prochaska E, Ammenwerth E. Clinical Utility and Usability of the Digital Box and Block Test: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies 2024;11:e54939 View
  15. Winterbottom L, Chen A, Mendonca R, Nilsen D, Ciocarlie M, Stein J. Clinician perceptions of a novel wearable robotic hand orthosis for post-stroke hemiparesis. Disability and Rehabilitation 2024:1 View
  16. Pereira A, Machado Neto O, Elui V, Pimentel M. Wearable Smartphone-Based Multisensory Feedback System for Torso Posture Correction: Iterative Design and Within-Subjects Study (Preprint). JMIR Aging 2023 View
  17. Bjørnskov S, Mortenson W, Helle T. User perceptions of aspects related to the use of the activity chair: A descriptive cross-sectional study. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 2024 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Thöne-Otto A. Assistive Technologien im Sozial- und Gesundheitssektor. View
  2. Demers M, Rowe J, Prochazka A. Neurorehabilitation Technology. View