This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Portable and Mobile Technologies for Rehabilitation (151) Emerging Technologies for Rehabilitation (261) mHealth for Telemedicine and Homecare (399)

Published on in Vol 2, No 1 (2015): Jan-Jun

Measurement and Data Transmission Validity of a Multi-Biosensor System for Real-Time Remote Exercise Monitoring Among Cardiac Patients

Measurement and Data Transmission Validity of a Multi-Biosensor System for Real-Time Remote Exercise Monitoring Among Cardiac Patients

Measurement and Data Transmission Validity of a Multi-Biosensor System for Real-Time Remote Exercise Monitoring Among Cardiac Patients

Authors of this article:

Jonathan C Rawstorn1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Nicholas Gant2 Author Orcid Image ;   Ian Warren3 Author Orcid Image ;   Robert Neil Doughty4 Author Orcid Image ;   Nigel Lever4 Author Orcid Image ;   Katrina K Poppe4 Author Orcid Image ;   Ralph Maddison1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (14) Tweetations (5) Metrics

Journals

  1. Soon S, Svavarsdottir H, Downey C, Jayne D. Wearable devices for remote vital signs monitoring in the outpatient setting: an overview of the field. BMJ Innovations 2020;6(2):55 View
  2. Rawstorn J, Gant N, Direito A, Beckmann C, Maddison R. Telehealth exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 2016;102(15):1183 View
  3. Nazari G, MacDermid J. Reliability of Zephyr BioHarness Respiratory Rate at Rest, During the Modified Canadian Aerobic Fitness Test and Recovery. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 2020;34(1):264 View
  4. Nazari G, MacDermid J, Sinden K, Richardson J, Tang A. Reliability of Zephyr Bioharness and Fitbit Charge Measures of Heart Rate and Activity at Rest, During the Modified Canadian Aerobic Fitness Test, and Recovery. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 2019;33(2):559 View
  5. Moreira R, Teles A, Fialho R, dos Santos T, Vasconcelos S, de Sá I, Bastos V, Silva F, Teixeira S. Can human posture and range of motion be measured automatically by smart mobile applications?. Medical Hypotheses 2020;142:109741 View
  6. Nie L, Berckmans D, Wang C, Li B. Is Continuous Heart Rate Monitoring of Livestock a Dream or Is It Realistic? A Review. Sensors 2020;20(8):2291 View
  7. Nazari G, Bobos P, MacDermid J, Sinden K, Richardson J, Tang A. Psychometric properties of the Zephyr bioharness device: a systematic review. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation 2018;10(1) View
  8. Anwer S, Li H, Antwi-Afari M, Umer W, Wong A. Evaluation of Physiological Metrics as Real-Time Measurement of Physical Fatigue in Construction Workers: State-of-the-Art Review. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 2021;147(5) View
  9. Morales-Botello M, Gachet D, de Buenaga M, Aparicio F, Busto M, Ascanio J. Chronic patient remote monitoring through the application of big data and internet of things. Health Informatics Journal 2021;27(3) View
  10. Pongsakornsathien N, Gardi A, Lim Y, Sabatini R, Kistan T. Wearable Cardiorespiratory Sensors for Aerospace Applications. Sensors 2022;22(13):4673 View
  11. Abuwarda Z, Mostafa K, Oetomo A, Hegazy T, Morita P. Wearable devices: Cross benefits from healthcare to construction. Automation in Construction 2022;142:104501 View
  12. Flux M, Fine T, Poplin T, Al Zoubi O, Schoenhals W, Schettler J, Refai H, Naegele J, Wohlrab C, Yeh H, Lowry C, Levine J, Smith R, Khalsa S, Feinstein J. Exploring the acute cardiovascular effects of Floatation-REST. Frontiers in Neuroscience 2022;16 View
  13. Fang R, Hosseini E, Zhang R, Fang C, Rafatirad S, Homayoun H. Survey on Pain Detection using Machine Learning Models (Preprint). JMIR AI 2023 View