TY - JOUR AU - Klatt, Brooke N AU - Hovareshti, Pedram AU - Holt, Lisa S AU - Dunlap, Pamela M AU - Zalkin, Chad AU - Tolani, Devendra AU - Whitney, Susan L PY - 2025 DA - 2025/2/4 TI - A Tablet-Based Technology for Objective Exercise Monitoring in Vestibular Rehabilitation: Mixed Methods Study JO - JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol SP - e58713 VL - 12 KW - technology KW - rehabilitation KW - vestibular KW - physical therapy KW - vestibulo-ocular reflex KW - ocular KW - physiotherapy KW - vision KW - feasibility KW - exercises KW - mHealth KW - mobile health KW - app KW - tablet KW - digital health KW - telerehabilitation KW - e-health KW - web-based KW - clinical use KW - physiotherapist KW - home exercise KW - usability study KW - mobile app AB - Background: A low-cost home exercise system called VestAid has been developed to assist participants during vestibulo-ocular reflex gaze stabilization exercises outside of clinic visits. The system includes a tablet-based app for the participant and a web-based portal for the physical therapist that provides data to make judgments about exercise accuracy and performance. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of VestAid in a pilot study of 10 participants (mean age 45 [SD 19] years; 6 women) with various vestibular diagnoses. Methods: All participants completed twelve 30-second horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex exercises in a seated position (6 “easy” and 6 “hard” exercises). The exercises differed by variations in the background color, pattern, and movement. One of the exercises was repeated to assess the test-retest reliability of the measure of gaze stability accuracy and head motion compliance during the exercise. Participants rated the difficulty of the exercises (0‐10 where 0=easy, 10=difficult) and completed usability surveys. Results: Participants completed the VestAid session without adverse events. The responses from the usability survey demonstrate the acceptability of VestAid. The mean rating of the “easy” exercises was 2.7/10 (SD 1.9). The mean rating for the “difficult” exercises across participants was 4.8/10 (SD 2.1). Conclusions: The consistency of the mean ratings of the participants with the exercise classifications (“easy” and “difficult”) suggests that VestAid has clinical utility. SN - 2369-2529 UR - https://rehab.jmir.org/2025/1/e58713 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/58713 DO - 10.2196/58713 ID - info:doi/10.2196/58713 ER -